

Call of Duty: Mobile
LiveShootersAdventure
- Platforms
- Release:
- 2019
- Developer:
- Activision, Timi
- Scale:
- Total installs423,000,000
- Player rating:
- 85.2% · 16.5M
- Profile data as of:
- August 29, 2026
Online multiplayer PvP FPS shooter with Battle Royale and Ranked Action!
Screenshots
Images from the source page, in source order. Select an image to view it full size.
Videos
Videos from the game’s source page, in source order. Select one to open the original.
Overview
- Franchise
- Call of Duty (brand)
- Call of Duty (series)
- Release date
- iOS — 2019
- Android — 2019
- Developer
- Publisher
- Unknown
- Age rating
- ESRB M — Mature 17+ · IGDB mirror
- PEGI 16 — age 16+ · IGDB mirror
- USK 16 — age 16+ · IGDB mirror
- CERO C — age 15+ · IGDB mirror
- ACB M — Mature, age 15+ · IGDB mirror
- GRAC 15+ — Ages 15+ · IGDB mirror
- ClassInd 16 — Ages 16+ · IGDB mirror
- Google Play Mature 17+ — age 17+ · Google Play
- Content warnings
- Not specified by the storefront
- Interaction modes
- Single-playerMultiplayer
- Session capacity
- Unknown
- Access model
- Free to play
- Monetization
- Unknown
- Storefront price
- Unknown
- Store contents
- Unknown
- Languages
- Unknown
Classification
- Genres
- ShootersAdventureEvidence:
- Setting and subject matter
- Modern day, Military Evidence:
- Camera
- First-person, Third-person Evidence:
- Visual style
- Realistic Evidence:
- Combat system type
- Shooting, Tactical combat Evidence:
Scale
Total installs · cumulative total
423,000,000
- Detailed value
- 423,345,100
- Coverage
- Google Play, worldwide
- Origin
- Published by source
- Confidence
- Medium — The storefront only publishes an approximate range; the exact count comes from the page's internal data
- Basis
- Google Play installs: 423345100; the storefront shows "100,000,000+"
- Date observed
- August 29, 2026
- Source
- Google Play
- Ratings
- players85.2% · 16.5MGoogle Play, worldwide · Google Play
- players69.3%Global · IGDB mirror
- critics82.5%Global · IGDB mirror
- Last update
- June 23, 2026 · Google Play
Mechanics
Key game systems from the Mechanics Catalog. Assessment axes are independent and are not combined into a single score. An unassessed mechanic is unknown, not absent.
A persistent player organization created or recognized by the game itself, with a stable membership, a life beyond one session, a shared identity, functions, and goals.
Assessment scope: Android
Official evidence establishes the recorded persistent player-organization boundary for Call of Duty: Mobile and supports these component results: identity and communication 1, collective goals 1, competition and territory 1, game integration 1. Unknown functions, adoption, and dependency were not inferred.
- Access cost:
- Unknown
- Product horizon:
- Unknown
- Participants:
- Unknown: the reviewed official material does not establish whether membership attaches to an account, character, server identity, or another unit.
- Participation format:
- The source establishes social and competitive play for Clan prizes; aggregation rules remain unknown.
- Depth:
- at most 1 of 5 — Identity layer
- What limits the result:
- Governance and permissions: Level 1 is an upper bound because the cited evidence does not establish governance; a stronger level was not inferred.
- Core experience relevance:
- Unknown
- Observed adoption:
- Unknown— No compatible count of unique mechanic participants and active eligible players was found for the same observation window.
- Structural expectation:
- Unknown
- Player dependency:
- Unknown
- Change direction:
- Not assessed
- Assessment type:
- Unknown
- Confidence:
- Medium— The cited material supports the recorded present classification and each linked substantive claim. Unstated adoption, dependency, and functions remain unknown.
Component scores (0–4):
- Identity and communication1 of 4 — The cited evidence supports score 1 for identity and communication; criteria not stated by the source were not inferred.
- Governance and permissionsNot assessed — The targeted official-source review did not establish governance; source silence was not converted to score 0.
- Shared progressionNot assessed — The targeted official-source review did not establish shared progression; source silence was not converted to score 0.
- Shared assets and economyNot assessed — The targeted official-source review did not establish shared assets and infrastructure; source silence was not converted to score 0.
- Collective goals and content1 of 4 — The cited evidence supports score 1 for collective goals; criteria not stated by the source were not inferred.
- Competition, territory, and politics1 of 4 — The cited evidence supports score 1 for competition and territory; criteria not stated by the source were not inferred.
- Game integration1 of 4 — The cited evidence supports score 1 for game integration; criteria not stated by the source were not inferred.
research draft · methodology 0.4 · September 2, 2026
An in-game system where player decisions materially influence at least part of the production, supply, distribution, or price of in-game value.
Assessment scope: Android
For Call of Duty: Mobile, the reviewed Activision Publishing, Inc. material does not establish whether the observed Android product line contains in-game transfer of value between players with rules affecting allocation or price.
- Access cost:
- Unknown
- Product horizon:
- Unknown
- Depth:
- Unknown
- Core experience relevance:
- Unknown
- Observed adoption:
- Unknown— The checked mechanic-specific material provides neither a compatible participant numerator, an active-audience denominator, nor source coverage sufficient to estimate adoption.
- Structural expectation:
- Unknown
- Player dependency:
- Unknown
- Change direction:
- Not assessed
- Assessment type:
- Unknown
- Confidence:
- Insufficient data— The reviewed Activision Publishing, Inc. material is insufficient to establish presence or absence. Silence was not treated as absence.
research draft · methodology 0.2 · September 2, 2026
A system where players or organizations capture, hold, and use parts of the game world with lasting consequences.
Assessment scope: Android
Official-source search did not resolve transferable, contestable ownership that persists beyond one session for this product boundary. Silence was not treated as absence.
- Access cost:
- Unknown
- Product horizon:
- Unknown
- Depth:
- Unknown
- Core experience relevance:
- Unknown
- Observed adoption:
- Unknown— Adoption reach is unmeasured: primary sources provide neither unique participants nor a compatible active-audience denominator.
- Structural expectation:
- Unknown
- Player dependency:
- Unknown
- Change direction:
- Unknown
- Assessment type:
- Unknown
- Confidence:
- Insufficient data— On 2026-09-02, official-domain mechanic-specific searches for Call of Duty: Mobile did not yield indexed primary evidence resolving Presence. Secondary sources were excluded.
research draft · methodology 0.3 · September 2, 2026
Structured competition between players with rules and a measurable outcome, usually including skill-based matchmaking.
Assessment scope: Android
Primary evidence identifies a competitive PvP mode, but it does not resolve the recorded-result unit required to score the rating ladder above 1. Other unresolved features remain Unknown.
- Access cost:
- Unknown
- Product horizon:
- Unknown
- Depth:
- at most 1 of 5 — Casual matches
- What limits the result:
- Rating and ladder: The recorded-result unit remains Unknown, so the rating ladder cannot be scored above 1 and level 2 is not established.
- Core experience relevance:
- Unknown
- Observed adoption:
- Unknown— Adoption reach is unmeasured: primary sources provide neither unique participants nor a compatible active-audience denominator.
- Structural expectation:
- Unknown
- Player dependency:
- Unknown
- Change direction:
- Unknown
- Assessment type:
- Unknown
- Confidence:
- Medium— 1 primary URL was reviewed on 2026-09-02. Each populated claim is bounded by its exact excerpt; unresolved values remain Unknown.
Component scores (0–4):
- Competitive formats1 of 4 — Score 1 is bounded by the official store claim: “Competitive ranked play that rewards skill and progression.”
- MatchmakingNot assessed — Primary evidence did not resolve opponent matchmaking; retained as Unknown.
- Rating and ladderNot assessed — The reviewed primary source names competitive or ranked play but does not identify a recorded-result unit; the component remains Unknown.
- Seasons and rewardsNot assessed — The current store page names a themed content season, but does not tie it to the competitive contour; retained as Unknown.
- Competitive integrityNot assessed — Primary evidence did not resolve competition-integrity controls; retained as Unknown.
- Skill expressionNot assessed — Primary evidence did not resolve skill differentiation; retained as Unknown.
- Game integration1 of 4 — Score 1 is bounded by the official store statement that competitive ranked play rewards progression.
research draft · methodology 0.3 · September 2, 2026
A regular rhythm of meaningful updates, including seasons, patches, events, and a roadmap that supports a long product life.
Assessment scope: Android
The retained primary item identifies a release-related fact, but the package does not contain the complete dated release series, cadence observations, support-team boundary, and persistence evidence required by section 15.13. A positive live-service result is therefore not published.
- Access cost:
- Unknown
- Product horizon:
- Unknown
- Depth:
- Unknown
- Core experience relevance:
- Unknown
- Observed adoption:
- Unknown— No compatible participation numerator and eligible-audience denominator were assembled for this exact boundary.
- Structural expectation:
- Unknown
- Player dependency:
- Unknown
- Change direction:
- Not assessed
- Assessment type:
- Unknown
- Confidence:
- Insufficient data— The checked source is insufficient for a positive result because the minimum evidence set in section 15.13 is incomplete.
Component scores (0–4):
- Release cadenceNot assessed
- Release announcementsNot assessed
- Content scope and typeNot assessed
- Seasonal structureNot assessed
- Event calendarNot assessed
- Roadmap transparencyNot assessed
- Response to playersNot assessed
- Game integrationNot assessed
research draft · methodology 0.3 · September 2, 2026
A system for long-term character or account development through levels, skills, equipment, and specializations.
Assessment scope: Android
The retained primary item identifies a progression-related fact, but the package does not establish the progression unit, cycle and reset rules, persistence, formal axes, cap, and post-cap state required by section 16.12. A positive character-progression result is therefore not published.
- Access cost:
- Unknown
- Product horizon:
- Unknown
- Depth:
- Unknown
- Core experience relevance:
- Unknown
- Observed adoption:
- Unknown— No compatible participation numerator and eligible-audience denominator were assembled for this exact boundary.
- Structural expectation:
- Unknown
- Player dependency:
- Unknown
- Change direction:
- Not assessed
- Assessment type:
- Unknown
- Confidence:
- Insufficient data— The checked source is insufficient for a positive result because the minimum evidence set in section 16.12 is incomplete.
Component scores (0–4):
- Path length and structureNot assessed
- Progression axesNot assessed
- Specialization choiceNot assessed
- Role of equipmentNot assessed
- Progression sourcesNot assessed
- Progress persistence and carry-overNot assessed
- Game integrationNot assessed
research draft · methodology 0.3 · September 2, 2026








