RealmScanner
Game profile

Free Fire

Clan system

A persistent player organization created or recognized by the game itself, with a stable membership, a life beyond one session, a shared identity, functions, and goals.

Assessed with methodology module 0.4. The dimensions are independent and do not produce a single score.

iOS

Present

research draft · methodology 0.4 · September 2, 2026 · The assessment uses the existing iOS boundary; the cited mechanic evidence does not independently establish App Store availability or current store state on 2026-09-02.

Official evidence establishes the recorded persistent player-organization boundary for Free Fire and supports these component results: identity and communication 1, shared progression 2, collective goals 2, game integration 2. Unknown functions, adoption, and dependency were not inferred.

Who participates:
A player joins a Guild; admission rules and the account-versus-character mapping remain unknown.
Group structure:
Members complete Guild missions and receive Guild-token rewards; aggregation rules remain unknown.

Assessment scope

Access cost:
Unknown
Product horizon:
Unknown

Independent dimensions

Depth:
at most 2 of 5 — Utility layer
What limits the result:
Governance and permissions: Level 2 is an upper bound because the cited evidence does not establish governance; a stronger level was not inferred.
Core experience relevance:
Unknown
Observed adoption:
Unknown— No compatible count of unique mechanic participants and active eligible players was found for the same observation window.
Structural expectation:
Unknown
Player dependency:
Unknown
Change direction:
Not assessed
Assessment type:
Unknown
Confidence:
Medium— The cited material supports the recorded present classification and each linked substantive claim. Unstated adoption, dependency, and functions remain unknown.

Component profile (0–4)

  • Identity and communication1 of 4 — The cited evidence supports score 1 for identity and communication; criteria not stated by the source were not inferred.
  • Governance and permissionsNot assessed — The targeted official-source review did not establish governance; source silence was not converted to score 0.
  • Shared progression2 of 4 — The cited evidence supports score 2 for shared progression; criteria not stated by the source were not inferred.
  • Shared assets and economyNot assessed — The targeted official-source review did not establish shared assets and infrastructure; source silence was not converted to score 0.
  • Collective goals and content2 of 4 — The cited evidence supports score 2 for collective goals; criteria not stated by the source were not inferred.
  • Competition, territory, and politicsNot assessed — The targeted official-source review did not establish competition and territory; source silence was not converted to score 0.
  • Game integration2 of 4 — The cited evidence supports score 2 for game integration; criteria not stated by the source were not inferred.

Evidence

My notes

No notes yet. Notes are stored only in this browser and are not sent to the server.

How this mechanic works in other games

RealmScanner is a research catalog for multiplayer games. Data comes from public sources; coverage and evidence appear beside each assessment.